Rowe, C. D., Moore, J. C., Remitti, F. & the IODP Expedition 343/343T Scientists. The thickness of subduction plate boundary faults from the seafloor into the seismogenic zone. Geology 41, 991–994 (2013).
Agard, P., Plunder, A., Angiboust, S., Bonnet, G. & Ruh, J. The subduction plate interface: rock record and mechanical coupling (from long to short timescales). Lithos 320–321, 537–566 (2018).
Oncken, O., Angiboust, S. & Dresen, G. Slow slip in subduction zones: reconciling deformation fabrics with instrumental observations and laboratory results. Geosphere 18, 104–129 (2021).
Bachmann, R. et al. Exposed plate interface in the European Alps reveals fabric styles and gradients related to an ancient seismogenic coupling zone. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B05402 (2009).
Angiboust, S., Glodny, J., Oncken, O. & Chopin, C. In search of transient subduction interfaces in the Dent Blanche–Sesia Tectonic System (W. Alps). Lithos 205, 298–321 (2014).
Wakabayashi, J. & Rowe, C. D. Whither the megathrust? Localization of large-scale subduction slip along the contact of a mélange. Int. Geol. Rev. 57, 854–870 (2015).
Nippress, S. E. J. & Rietbrock, A. Seismogenic zone high permeability in the Central Andes inferred from relocations of micro-earthquakes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 263, 235–245 (2007).
Woollam, J., Rietbrock, A., Leitloff, J. & Hinz, S. HEX: hyperbolic event extractor, a seismic phase associator for highly active seismic regions. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91, 2769–2778 (2020).
Woollam, J. et al. SeisBench—a toolbox for machine learning in seismology. Seismol. Res. Lett. 93, 1695–1709 (2022).
León-Ríos, S. et al. 1D-velocity structure and seismotectonics of the Ecuadorian margin inferred from the 2016 Mw 7.8 Pedernales aftershock sequence. Tectonophysics 767, 228165 (2019).
Zhang, H. & Thurber, C. H. Double-difference tomography: the method and its application to the Hayward Fault, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1875–1889 (2003).
Font, Y., Segovia, M., Vaca, S. & Theunissen, T. Seismicity patterns along the Ecuadorian subduction zone: new constraints from earthquake location in a 3-D a priori velocity model. Geophys. J. Int. 193, 263–286 (2013).
García Cano, L. C., Galve, A., Charvis, P. & Marcaillou, B. Three-dimensional velocity structure of the outer fore arc of the Colombia-Ecuador subduction zone and implications for the 1958 megathrust earthquake rupture zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 1041–1060 (2014).
Meneghini, F. & Moore, J. C. Deformation and hydrofracture in a subduction thrust at seismogenic depths: the Rodeo Cove thrust zone, Marin Headlands, California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 119, 174–183 (2007).
Li, J. et al. Downdip variations in seismic reflection character: Implications for fault structure and seismogenic behavior in the Alaska subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 120, 7883–7904 (2015).
Bebout, G. E. & Penniston-Dorland, S. C. Fluid and mass transfer at subduction interfaces—the field metamorphic record. Lithos 240–243, 228–258 (2016).
Fagereng, Å. Geology of the seismogenic subduction thrust interface. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 359, 55–76 (2011).
Kitamura, Y. et al. Mélange and its seismogenic roof décollement: a plate boundary fault rock in the subduction zone—an example from the Shimanto Belt, Japan. Tectonics 24, TC5012 (2005).
Rowe, C. D. & Griffith, W. A. Do faults preserve a record of seismic slip: a second opinion. J. Struct. Geol. 78, 1–26 (2015).
Meneghini, F. et al. Record of mega-earthquakes in subduction thrusts: the black fault rocks of Pasagshak Point (Kodiak Island, Alaska). Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 122, 1280–1297 (2010).
Nedimović, M. R., Hyndman, R. D., Ramachandran, K. & Spence, G. D. Reflection signature of seismic and aseismic slip on the northern Cascadia subduction interface. Nature 424, 416–420 (2003).
Peng, Z. & Zhao, P. Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 2, 877–881 (2009).
Perfettini, H., Frank, W. B., Marsan, D. & Bouchon, M. Updip and along-strike aftershock migration model driven by afterslip: application to the 2011 Tohoku-Oki aftershock sequence. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 2653–2669 (2019).
Shapiro, S. A., Patzig, R., Rothert, E. & Rindschwentner, J. Triggering of seismicity by pore-pressure perturbations: permeability-related signatures of the phenomenon. Pure Appl. Geophys. 160, 1051–1066 (2003).
Perfettini, H., Frank, W. B., Marsan, D. & Bouchon, M. A model of aftershock migration driven by afterslip. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 2283–2293 (2018).
Lange, D. et al. Comparison of postseismic afterslip models with aftershock seismicity for three subduction-zone earthquakes: Nias 2005, Maule 2010 and Tohoku 2011. Geophys. J. Int. 199, 784–799 (2014).
Allen, T. I. & Hayes, G. P. Alternative rupture‐scaling relationships for subduction interface and other offshore environments. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 107, 1240–1253 (2017).
Brengman, C. M. J., Barnhart, W. D., Mankin, E. H. & Miller, C. N. Earthquake‐scaling relationships from geodetically derived slip distributions. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 109, 1701–1715 (2019).
Das, S. & Henry, C. Spatial relation between main earthquake slip and its aftershock distribution. Rev. Geophys. 41, 1013 (2003).
Neo, J. C., Huang, Y., Yao, D. & Wei, S. Is the aftershock zone area a good proxy for the mainshock rupture area? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 111, 424–438 (2021).
Agurto, H., Rietbrock, A., Ryder, I. & Miller, M. Seismic-afterslip characterization of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile, earthquake based on moment tensor inversion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L20303 (2012).
Wetzler, N., Lay, T., Brodsky, E. E. & Kanamori, H. Systematic deficiency of aftershocks in areas of high coseismic slip for large subduction zone earthquakes. Sci. Adv. 4, eaao3225 (2018).
Woessner, J., Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S. & Mai, P. M. Spatial correlation of aftershock locations and on-fault main shock properties. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B08301 (2006).
Sun, T., Saffer, D. & Ellis, S. Mechanical and hydrological effects of seamount subduction on megathrust stress and slip. Nat. Geosci. 13, 249–255 (2020).
Wesnousky, S. G. Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: issues and implications for seismic-hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1609–1632 (2008).
Kato, A. & Obara, K. Step-like migration of early aftershocks following the 2007 Mw 6.7 Noto-Hanto earthquake, Japan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3864–3869 (2014).
Bedford, J. et al. A high-resolution, time-variable afterslip model for the 2010 Maule Mw = 8.8, Chile megathrust earthquake. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 383, 26–36 (2013).
Huang, H., Xu, W., Meng, L., Bürgmann, R. & Baez, J. C. Early aftershocks and afterslip surrounding the 2015 Mw 8.4 Illapel rupture. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 457, 282–291 (2017).
Churchill, R. M., Werner, M. J., Biggs, J. & Fagereng, Å. Afterslip moment scaling and variability from a global compilation of estimates. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 127, e2021JB023897 (2022).
Geist, E. L. & Bilek, S. L. Effect of depth-dependent shear modulus on tsunami generation along subduction zones. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1315–1318 (2001).
Chalumeau, C., Agurto-Detzel, H., De Barros, L., Charvis, P. & the Rapid Response Team of the 2016 Pedernales Earthquake Spatio-temporal evolution of aftershock and repeater source properties after the 2016 Pedernales earthquake (Ecuador). J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 128, e2022JB025353 (2023).
Eshelby, J. D. The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Math. Phys. Sci. 241, 376–396 (1957).
Aki, K. Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata Earthquake of June 16, 1964.: Part 2. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from the G wave spectrum. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 44, 73–88 (1966).
Torabi, A. & Berg, S. S. Scaling of fault attributes: a review. Mar. Pet. Geol. 28, 1444–1460 (2011).
León-Ríos, S. et al. 3D local earthquake tomography of the Ecuadorian margin in the source area of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Pedernales earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 126, e2020JB020701 (2021).
Miller, P. K. et al. P- and S-wave velocities of exhumed metasediments from the Alaskan subduction zone: implications for the in situ conditions along the megathrust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL094511 (2021).
Wang, K. et al. Stable forearc stressed by a weak megathrust: mechanical and geodynamic implications of stress changes caused by the M = 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 6179–6194 (2019).
Dielforder, A., Hetzel, R. & Oncken, O. Megathrust shear force controls mountain height at convergent plate margins. Nature 582, 225–229 (2020).
Wells, D. L. & Coppersmith, K. J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 974–1002 (1994).
Zhu, W. & Beroza, G. C. PhaseNet: a deep-neural-network-based seismic arrival-time picking method. Geophys. J. Int. 216, 261–273 (2019).
Lomax, A., Virieux, J., Volant, P. & Berge-Thierry, C. in Advances in Seismic Event Location (eds Thurber, C. H. & Rabinowitz, N.) 101–134 (Springer, 2000).
Lomax, A., Michelini, A. & Curtis, A. in Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science (ed. Meyers, R. A.) 1–33 (Springer, 2014).
Bakun, W. H. & Joyner, W. B. The ML scale in central California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 1827–1843 (1984).
Hardebeck, J. L. & Shearer, P. M. A new method for determining first-motion focal mechanisms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 2264–2276 (2002).
Hardebeck, J. L. & Shearer, P. M. Using S/P amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2434–2444 (2003).
Fehler, M., House, L. & Kaieda, H. Determining planes along which earthquakes occur: method and application to earthquakes accompanying hydraulic fracturing. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 92, 9407–9414 (1987).
Related Posts
Global Indian Entrepreneur Diipa Khosla’s Documentary to Premiere at Harvard School; Details Inside
[ad_1] Diipa Khosla is a forerunner in the world of global entrepreneurship, and her influence is apparent in business and academia. (Image: Instagram)This will be Diipa Büller Khosla's third appearance at Harvard, a significant turning point…
Principal Software Engineer – Robotics Warehouse Systems
Job title: Principal Software Engineer - Robotics Warehouse Systems Company: Symbotic Job description: through the supply chain. Intelligent software orchestrates advanced robots in a high-density, end-to-end system - reinventing... warehouse automation for increased efficiency, speed…
Shift Leader
Job title: Shift Leader Company: MFA Oil Company Job description: , bookkeeping, fuel management, and ensuring that all equipment/store/property is well maintained and in good condition; maintain... Expected salary: Location: Ashland, MO Job date: Wed,…